<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email Etiquette for Message Importance – When “Importance: High” = “Don’t Waste Your Time”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://askthemanager.com/2009/06/email-etiquette-for-message-importance-when-importance-high-equals-dont-waste-your-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://askthemanager.com/2009/06/email-etiquette-for-message-importance-when-importance-high-equals-dont-waste-your-time/</link>
	<description>Leadership Development &#38; Management Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 10:38:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skip Anderson</title>
		<link>http://askthemanager.com/2009/06/email-etiquette-for-message-importance-when-importance-high-equals-dont-waste-your-time/#comment-38254</link>
		<dc:creator>Skip Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askthemanager.com/?p=200#comment-38254</guid>
		<description>You are so right. I get a bi-weekly email from an organization that holds &quot;get acquainted&quot; meetings in hopes I (and others) will become a member, and they&#039;re always flagged as being of &quot;High Importance&quot;

This email might be highly important to them because they need members, but it&#039;s not highly important to me...in fact it&#039;s not important at all to me. If I wanted to join their organization, I would have done so already.

The emails Would be highly important, however, if they included a free trip for two to Greece with every membership. That would be truly of high importance.

This sender, and all email senders who tag their messages with &quot;high importance&quot;, would be well served to remember the &quot;What&#039;s In It For Me&quot; concept; recipients don&#039;t care about the sender, they only care about themselves.

But instead, I have classified all email from this sender as &quot;junk&quot; so now I don&#039;t read any of their emails, they end up in junk-email-land so they&#039;ve lost 100% of my attention by crying wolf with every email they&#039;ve sent me in the last two years.

Skip Anderson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so right. I get a bi-weekly email from an organization that holds &#8220;get acquainted&#8221; meetings in hopes I (and others) will become a member, and they&#8217;re always flagged as being of &#8220;High Importance&#8221;</p>
<p>This email might be highly important to them because they need members, but it&#8217;s not highly important to me&#8230;in fact it&#8217;s not important at all to me. If I wanted to join their organization, I would have done so already.</p>
<p>The emails Would be highly important, however, if they included a free trip for two to Greece with every membership. That would be truly of high importance.</p>
<p>This sender, and all email senders who tag their messages with &#8220;high importance&#8221;, would be well served to remember the &#8220;What&#8217;s In It For Me&#8221; concept; recipients don&#8217;t care about the sender, they only care about themselves.</p>
<p>But instead, I have classified all email from this sender as &#8220;junk&#8221; so now I don&#8217;t read any of their emails, they end up in junk-email-land so they&#8217;ve lost 100% of my attention by crying wolf with every email they&#8217;ve sent me in the last two years.</p>
<p>Skip Anderson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

