More Leadership Lessons from the Airline Industry – Delta Stubs Their Toe (Again)

More Leadership Lessons from Delta Airlines

In a recent post, we admonished Delta Airlines for the ill-conceived, confusing Delta Breezeway enacted in late 2007. It seemed that even months after its introduction, most Delta gate agents and Delta frequent fliers still had no idea how to use them.

We are proud to say that between Thanksgiving and Christmas, Delta gate agents suddenly began using the Delta Breezeway consistently across the seven different airports we used. (This is a record, to be sure, as any Delta gate outside of Atlanta or Cincinnati employed a different set of rules when using the Breezeway for the first ten months following its inception.)

Congratulations Delta for finally making sense of something so simple – of course, we still believe you could have rolled this out more intelligently; employing proper project management principles coupled with better education and training.

Delta Airlines – Not Sweating the Small Stuff

The debacle that was the Delta Breezeway reveals a lackadaisical attitude in the Delta boardroom for truly serving the customer. Delta simply doesn’t sweat the small stuff. In any normal leadership situation the ability to not sweat the small stuff is an admirable quality. Given the razor thin margins of the airline industry, it’s almost required that you sweat everything – especially the small stuff that impacts your customers.

Southwest Airlines (SWA) gets it. The SWA leadership has always been known as a group that plans everything from boarsding a plane to their overall business health. SWA gets it; and they generally get it right the first time.

As a disclaimer, it’s important to note that none of the AskTheManager editors enjoys flying on Southwest. Their cattle call style of assigning seats and loading planes might make logistical sense – and families with kids seem to be okay with it – but it is terrible for business fliers who travel for a living. That said, SWA is the healthiest airline in America and deserves to be studied by those who are struggling. (Hint for the other airlines: look at SWA’s leadership, and how the company tests and measures before they implement wholesale changes.)




You Cannot Test Ideas in the Boardroom

Southwest’s style of loading planes, as we wrote, has been a nuisance for business travelers – especially those who like to lounge before they fly. We must know we will have the aisle seat in the exit row and we don’t want to have to fight for it.

In the airline industry, unloading and loading planes quickly – faster than your rivals – earns you a competitive advantage. SWA gets this. They’ve made a conscience choice to forego most business travelers in return for better margins. That is their choice.

It’s old news, but Southwest experimented with assigned seating for about a year only to decide to slightly modify their 36-year old cattle drive in favor of a more orderly numbered seating system. (To read more about this decision, here’s a news story from September 2007.) No assigned seats, but with less of a cattle call. The leadership lesson for Delta is not that they should switch to a numbered system for assigning seats, rather that they should alter the way they enact changes at their struggling airline.

Last month – just days after Delta completed its merger with Northwest and proclaimed that there would be no immediate changes – Delta made an enormous change to the way everyone, including frequent fliers, gains access to premium seats (exit rows, most aisle seats and coach seats near the front of the aircraft). They adopted, without warning or testing, a system that we’ve been told was in place at Northwest. They wanted everyone to pay extra for those seats.

While we’re are certainly not opposed to Delta raising revenue in creative ways, we were absolutely shocked to learn that as frequent fliers we didn’t even have access to those seats until check-in. You see, Delta wanted to sell those seats at a premium to regular fliers, so they blocked frequent fliers from gaining access to those seats.

They clearly tested this concept only in the boardroom, and it passed with flying colors.

Oops, Time to Reverse another Bad Delta Decision

To their credit, Delta only made their coveted Platinum and Gold members suffer for a few weeks before they reversed this idiotic and untested change. We can only imagine the emails that flooded Delta.com complaining of this policy (we know of a few sent by us that were not pleasant).

The moral of this story for all businesses is to follow the Southwest example. Even when the world was telling them for decades that their system for assigning seats should be altered, they resisted the temptation to enact wholesale changes and tested (for months, in controlled situations at just a few select locations) a new system before determining a course of action.

This is why Southwest has fared better than Delta and the other large airlines. The Delta leadership could learn a thing or two from Southwest.  

Detroit’s Automakers: Why They Deserved The Money

Why Detroit Deserved Their Bailout…

(We understand we’re a little late to the party, but we were on hiatus during the whole Auto Bailout mess, and we felt we would be remiss if we didn’t provide our two cents.)

While there is no doubt that the Detroit automakers sowed many of the seeds of their own destruction, these seeds were sown decades ago in the 1950s, 60s, 70s and 80s; and the blame for the current financial health of the Big 3 should not be laid solely at the feet of today’s business and union leadership teams.

Interestingly, American automakers are in this predicament because, over the years, they accomplished their jobs; and they accomplished them with integrity to the mission at hand.

The union employees and their stewards and representatives served the needs of the workers – current and future. The executive leadership served the needs of the companies’ shareholders. This was their job, and it was this strategy that built and maintained an industry in America that was unmatched.

And while we can argue that Chrysler, General Motors and Ford were shortsighted in their planning, research and development – because none of the three introduced the Prius for example; or because they were too dependent on large SUVs and trucks for the bulk of their revenues – anyone doing so would prove that they do not fully understand the American economic system. These companies served the interests of their shareholders and their employees, and that was their job.


To deny that the American automotive industry hasn’t changed – they they haven’t begun producing fuel-efficient vehicles, that they weren’t proactive in reducing dealership ranks, or that they don’t equally serve their communities and their shareholders – would be shortsighted.

Automakers Still More Than $100 Billion Short of AIG

When we compare Detroit to Wall Street, the requested bailout amounts aren’t the only vast differences between the two. While the American auto industry could have done more to lessen the effects of the current recession, it was the leaders of the Wall Street firms that are receiving the greatest bailout amounts that caused the very economic crisis we are faced with today – the same economic crisis that caused the current recession that nudged the American auto industry on the brink of failure in the first place. You can’t blame Detroit’s issues on the Big 3 without including likes of AIG, Lehman and others.

While Detroit’s product and cost woes were primarily caused by business and union leaders long since gone; the Wall Street crisis was the brainchild of the same management teams in charge today. Automakers did not make risky bets with shareholder money or over-leverage their firms to maximize their own bonuses – that was the exclusive domain of Wall Street.

In the end, we are free market thinkers at AskTheManager.com, but we are also fair. Fair is fair, and we cannot use tax dollars to assist those who caused the crisis without also using a few bucks to help those caught up in it.

 

Gallup Poll: Business Executives Lack Honesty and Integrity

“Business Executives” Rank Low in Annual Honesty and Ethics Poll

While nurses topped the list for the seventh consecutive year, business executives earned relatively poor grades in the latest installment of the annual integrity poll from Gallup.

The poll, which surveyed just over 1,000 US adults earlier this month, asked respondents how they would rate the honesty and ethical standards of people in one of twenty-one different professions. Lobbyists were dead last for the second consecutive year, followed closely by telemarketers and car salesmen. To see the entire list, follow this link.

The list of professions included in the Gallup poll reads somewhat like the results one might expect to see when a classroom of first graders are asked “what do you want to be when you grow up?” Adding princess, fireman, and army soldier would probably round out the possibilities for any group of six-year olds.

Funny thing about Gallup’s choice of professions; some, like “high school teachers,” are quite specific; while others, like “business executives,” are incredibly vague.

While none of the AskTheManager.com editors would argue against the need for more honesty and higher ethics in business, we are a little confused by Gallup’s use of the seemingly all-inclusive term “business executives.”

Liars, Damn Liars, and Pollsters

Just who are these “business executives” anyway? Are they Dick Fuld and the late Kenneth Lay? Are they P. Diddy and Donald Trump? Are they the millions of business owners, CEOs, COOs, presidents, vice presidents and other executives whose jobs are so different from one another that they hardly can be classified in fifty categories, let alone a single one?

We suspect that most of the 1,010 US adults who lack caller ID (otherwise, why would they answer a call from a pollster?) pictured some sinister, overweight, overpaid, cigar-chomping CEO of a bankrupt company when they were asked their opinion of business executives. Of course business executives ranked low.

While one can easily group extremely similar positions together to identify such professions as nurses, car salesmen, policemen, funeral directors, pharmacists, telemarketers, and real estate agents; we find ourselves struggling to identify what Gallup means by the nebulous group “business executives.”

It’s all in the Headlines




In 2001 (and only in 2001) this particular Gallup poll included the category “firefighters.” Not surprisingly, firefighters overwhelmingly topped all other professions that year (the poll was taken about two months after 9/11). This begs the question: Did the Gallup organization exploit the tragedy of 9/11 and the sudden popularity of firefighters for the sake of a more compelling headline?

Only Gallup knows for sure. Overall, we think this is a quaint little poll of very little value. Many of the twenty-one professions appear to be included merely to provide fodder for talk radio hosts and bloggers. Why else would Gallup include funeral directors and not coroners; lawyers and not judges; telemarketers and not convenience store clerks; or bankers and not bakers? Why only twenty-one professions?

Perhaps if Gallup were interested in delivering public opinions worthy of action, they might change their annual integrity poll to include hundreds of professions instead of just twenty-one. This should add a level of validity the current poll does not enjoy.

May we also suggest Gallup find suitable replacements for the ill-defined “business executives?” Perhaps the categories “Fortune 500 CEOs,” “small business owners,” “cartoon villains,” “mid-level managers,” “board members,” “white-collar criminals,” and “junior executives” would cover all possibilities.

Oh Yeah, Let’s Add One More Profession…

Lest we forget, we think it might be appropriate for Gallup to add one more profession to next year’s annual integrity poll: pollsters. Of course, we suspect they wouldn’t be happy with the results.

 

Leadership Development Blogwatch – November 23, 2008

 

Best of the Leadership Development Blogs

The past two weeks on the Leadership Development blogs delivered a middling of mediocrity and only a few top posts. Whether due to the economic turmoil or to some post-Halloween hangover, some of the strongest leadership writers have been quiet. (Luckily, we had a few posts, as did Dr. Earl R. Smith II.)

The AskTheManager.com editors chose the following posts to represent the best of the Leadership Development blogs for the two weeks ending November 23, 2008:




Diminishing Return
If you’re like me, a type A, then the idea of one more call or sentence is a lure. But the reality is we reach diminishing return well before we think. This is not only an issue for type A people. It really flows through our culture (in

Top 100 Best Books for Managers, Leaders & Humans
Marshall Goldsmith, Mark Reiter (leadership development, executive coaching, leadership). 8, Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies Jim Collins, Jerry I. Porras (business, management, leadership development, leadership)

Governing in a Crisis
Risk management committees should also assess the corporation’s leadership development programs. A crisis demands strong leadership on the scene and in the boardroom. The CEO must provide direction for the company to find its way out of

5 ways to develop leaders
This leadership industry of selling goods and services shows there’s tons of interest in leadership development amidst organizations of all kinds: government, business, corporations, non-profits, ministries, churches, et al.

The First 90 Days Critical Success Strategies for New Leaders at
The First 90 Days should be incorporated into every company’s leadership development strategy, so that anyone making a transition in an organization can get up to speed quicker and smarter.” -Suzanne M. Danielle, Director of Global

Leadership Development and the Future of Business
What is the Future of Business and why is Leadership Development important? Well, since I am not a psychic nor of divine providence, I, like you, can only guess. However, there are some clear writings on the multitude of walls around …

Thoughts on Leadership from Madeleine Albright
Found this yesterday on the Wall Street Journal Online. Ms. Albright gives some interesting thoughts on leadership and women’s issues. I noticed her embrace of community (reference her reflections on her time at the UN) as well.

Assess and Fine Tune Your Leadership Skills
Remember that we are talking about a leadership development process that extends for many years – leadership development is a preparation for the future by developing the skills and abilities of the present. My leadership coaching helps …

Goldman “Leaders” Choose Poverty over Incarceration
Goldman Leaders Forgo 2008 Bonuses In a recent email from one of our readers, we were asked to weigh in on the Goldman Sachs Group’s leadership decision to request no bonuses for the current calendar year. What are your thoughts on the …

Leadership Development Coaching
Smith specializes in turnaround management, strategic planning, leadership development and executive coaching. He also works as an executive and/or life coach in the areas of personal growth and spirituality. He is the author of Amazing …

The Leader’s Gift-Giving Guide – Holiday Gifts Everyone Can Use
Holiday Gifts for the Office Crowd ‘tis the season to think about all the people who helped you get where you are today. Whether you are a senior leader or an up-and-coming manager, it’s important for you to thank those who make an …

How Small Business Owners Benefit from Coaching
Smith specializes in turnaround management, strategic planning, leadership development and executive coaching. He also works as an executive and/or life coach in the areas of personal growth and spirituality. He is the author of Amazing …

The Two Paths to Great Leadership
Two roads. Had a great conversation with Marc yesterday. We spoke a lot about future plans with our two companies, but it was his brief statement below that made me pause:. “You have two paths you can go on in this environment. …

Young Managers Can Learn from Old Sayings
Old Sayings are Often Gold Sayings Yes, that hackneyed phrase was as hard to type as it is to read, but I used it to illustrate a point: an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure; you do reap what you sow; and actions do speak …

Mastering the Art of Leadership
Through leadership development. Why? Because good leaders are made and the process itself is a continuous process of improvement. Here are seven ways to begin developing your leadership right away. Develop your hard skills through …

How to find a leadership coach
They impart special skills through techniques and seminars and deal with issues like personal growth, leadership styles, leadership development and much more. Here emphasis is more on making the management team members more effective …

 

Email Etiquette Lessons from the Cleveland Browns’ Phil Savage – Dropping the F-Bomb is So Not Cool

 

Phil Savage, Cleveland Browns GM, Responds too Quickly

While email etiquette in business has long been an important topic to the editors of AskTheManager.com, we’ve never pontificated on the importance of responding expeditiously. We’ve posted articles and opinions about email typos, email signatures, and we even ranked the worst email etiquette mistakes of all time in a two-part series. Had we weighed in on email response speed, we would have said speed is good.

That was until we read about Phil Savage. In Savage’s case, speed kills.

As first reported by the website deadspin.com, Cleveland Browns GM Phil Savage responded quickly Monday night to an idiot fan’s relentless and constant email criticism with the not-so-friendly reply “go root for Buffalo, f*ck you.” (Editor’s note: Phil used a vowel in place of the asterisk.)

You don’t have to be a seasoned leader to know that his response easily tops our list of the worst email etiquette mistakes ever. It’s hard to beat the F-bomb when it comes to what you shouldn’t say in a business email.




The Email Etiquette “24-Hour Rule”

Firing off an angry memo or cursing someone out over the phone ten or more years ago was not a big deal – in the Internet Age, angry responses will haunt you forever. Just as we learned from Alec Baldwin’s “thoughtless little pig” rant that you shouldn’t leave nasty voicemails, we now know from Phil Savage that you shouldn’t write “f*ck you” in an email.

(Seriously, didn’t we already know that?)

Before the onset of the World Wide Web, it was common practice for enlightened leaders to withhold a response when they were irritated. In a proper display of etiquette, they practiced the 24-Hour Rule – that is, they would wait twenty-four hours before sending a nasty note or letter. The prevailing wisdom assumed (correctly) that whatever made them angry today would seem less important in twenty-four hours.

It’s been almost 72 hours since Savage’s savage reply to the thoughtless-little-pig-of-a-fan, and we’re pretty sure it all seems less important now. 

 

Goldman “Leaders” Choose Poverty over Incarceration

Goldman Leaders Forgo 2008 Bonuses

In a recent email from one of our readers, we were asked to weigh in on the Goldman Sachs Group’s leadership decision to request no bonuses for the current calendar year.

What are your thoughts on the following article?  How does this reflect leadership during these troubled times? – Tye Mills

(To read the article Tye mentions, follow this link.)

Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs, and six other top executives asked the board’s compensation committee to skip them during bonus time this year.

Pardon us if we don’t cheer.

While it is certainly admirable that these executives would take a seemingly proactive step to helping right the ship at Goldman, this decision should have come from the board (not from the executives) and should have come much sooner than November 2008. (In the nature of full disclosure, the executives likely gave up their bonuses because Attorney General Andrew Cuomo warned them last month that the bonuses might break New York State law.)

We never begrudge any executive their compensation nor any corporation their profits. This is the way our system works; and our system has worked better than any other in the history of the world. The prosperity enjoyed from Joe Six-Pack to Joe the Plumber is in large part due to the spoils enjoyed by the executives of the Fortune 500.

Take away their incentive to make money and you take away our standard of living.

Further, the seeds of destruction at corporations like Goldman and Lehman that plunged the world into economic turmoil were not planted by large bonuses. Rather, it was inattentive executives and especially their boards of directors who drove us off this cliff – while laughing and smiling all the way to the bank.




But How Will They Feed Their Families?

TheManager will not get a bonus this year, either. Not because I petitioned the board, but because my bonus is set up to pay out only when the shareholders make money. In 2008, my company’s shareholders lost quite a bit.

The removal of truly performance-based bonus pay is where most executives and boards have failed the owners of their companies; and why many of these men and women should be in jail. Leveraging your shareholders for personal gain, as Lehman has been reported to have done, by ratios of 30:1 or worse is criminal. No owner (and that’s what stockholders are) would ever agree to assume risks of this magnitude.

Before you worry about poor Lloyd and his crew, they will still receive roughly $600,000 each in base salary this year. Additionally, we can only wish that they were able to save some of their bonus from last year. (Just as the wheels of the economy were coming off in 2007, the top three executives at Goldman Sachs made more than $57 million each.)

It’s No Longer a Free Market

Companies, and especially their highly paid executives, have argued that multi-million dollar bonuses were necessary to “to attract and retain top talent.”

Top talent? By top talent, I’m hopeful you don’t mean Dick Fuld of Lehman or even Lloyd Blankfein.

Before we break our arms patting old Lloyd on the back, let’s remember that Blankfein was the CEO when Goldman posted a 70 percent drop in profits last quarter. Additionally, Blankfein was the CEO when Goldman stock plunged 69 percent this year. Doesn’t sound like bonus time to me.

In a free market, Goldman is free to pay its executives whatever they can grab. However, the market is no longer free for Goldman, Morgan Stanley and many other firms. Goldman, you see, took 10 billion of your tax dollars in the recent bailout. This makes them, in our opinion, a quasi-governmental entity. At the very least, they should be heavily regulated until we get our $10 billion back – this includes their executive compensation plans.

Back to Tye’s Question

Tye asked, “How does this reflect leadership during these troubled times?”

Tye, if this were truly a leadership move and not a classic CYA*, I would be impressed. I am not.

I would have been impressed if the leadership of Goldman Sachs had taken the long view toward building wealth for their shareholders and clients instead of focusing on their multi-million dollar paydays.

Once Goldman became a publicly traded entity in 1999 they moved the risk from themselves (the partners) to the shareholders. Without the risk, they were like drunken coeds on South Padre Island waiting for their shot on Girls Gone Wild.

Leadership is about service and sacrifice. Giving up a bonus because you’re afraid to go to jail is self preservation. Self preservation is as far from leadership as $57 million is from $600,000.

To read some interesting notes about the current crisis and how we really got there, check out a great article published last week by Liar’s Poker author Michael Lewis. It brings some closure to the fall of Salomon Brothers and some great insights into today’s troubles. Lewis convincingly argues that Salomon’s move from a partnership to a publicly traded corporation led to the current collapse. To read Lewis’ article, follow this link.

*Editor’s Note: CYA is code for “cover your ass.”

Barack Obama – Enlightened Leader?

Leadership Lessons from the President-Elect

As someone who voted for John McCain, I have to admit that (so far) I’m impressed by one of the leadership moves proposed by President-elect Barack Obama. It looks like Obama may build his Cabinet with those who often disagree with him.

Throughout the campaign, Obama seemed like someone who would say and do anything to be President. (In this respect, he was not so unlike McCain.) Obama, it seemed, just wanted to be President so bad that he actually made me nervous.

In fact, the AskTheManager.com editors were so confused by his windblown opinions during the campaign that we ranked him third behind McCain and Sarah Palin in ability to lead. This latest move to embrace his rivals will surely vault him ahead of Palin. (To see the original rankings, follow this link.)

Though I will never agree with Obama’s socialist leanings – and I believe his proposed economic policies could potentially destroy the very things that made this country great – his apparent willingness to embrace adversaries in an effort to staff his Cabinet with the very best is impressive.

What Business Leaders Can Learn From Obama

Just elected CEO of the World, Barack Obama could take the path that many Fortune 500 leaders have taken. He could surround himself with his friends, reward his loyal and faithful followers, and staff his team with a plethora of yes-men and yes-women.

For the moment, it appears Obama will take a page directly from the greatest Republican President (and second greatest Leadership-President) of all time. Obama has hinted that he will follow Abraham Lincoln’s lead and choose the most qualified – not necessarily the most loyal – to fill his Cabinet posts. (To see our rankings of US Presidents as leaders, follow this link.)

Presidents and business leaders generally claim they want to surround themselves with strong-willed people possessing the courage to disagree with them – seldom do they follow through with this position. A great example is provided by the worst President of all time, Richard Nixon.




Though he claimed he hated yes-men, no one dared tell Nixon “no.” Because his Cabinet was filled with neutered-nothings, his merry band of sycophants stood idly by while his presidency imploded.

Secretary of State Hillary?

Obama, hinting to appointments for Hillary Clinton, Republicans, and others who have disagreed with him, might actually be serious. If he is, he will be in rare company.

Lincoln appointed political enemies to important posts, including one who went so far as to describe Lincoln as a “long-armed ape.” Tough words in 1860.

If Obama follows Lincoln’s lead and appoints those he feels are most qualified to hold significant posts, and if he encourages them to disagree with him on important issues, he may very well set an example that all CEOs should follow. (Call me naïve, but I believe Lincoln’s leadership style could have saved virtually all of the companies declaring bankruptcy this year.)

Every leader needs people around them to tell them when they have no clothes. True leaders forget their egos and reward subordinates who have dissenting viewpoints – we’re hopeful that’s why they hired them in the first place.

Time will tell if Obama has skin thick enough to want the truth from his Cabinet, though I like what I see so far.

In Leadership, Obama Bats .500

It couldn’t all be good news, could it?

While I’m certainly impressed by what everyone thinks Obama may do with his Cabinet, I’m somewhat less impressed by the leadership lesson he provides in abandoning his Senate seat tomorrow.

If challenged, Obama’s people would surely claim that the President-elect needs to prepare for his first term, and that the Senate will be fine without him.

Really?

Doesn’t the lame duck Congress need to tackle the greatest economic crisis the US has seen in more than 70 years? Isn’t this the precise reason the people of Illinois elected him to serve? At a time when the country is devoid of leadership, Barack Obama provides a terrible lesson to the nation’s leaders: when the going gets tough, some people quit.

Winners Never Quit and…

While it’s true that Senator Barack Obama will be replaced in the US Senate, his replacement most likely won’t take office until after Christmas; and he/she most certainly won’t take office next week when the Senate meets to discuss the economic bailouts.

Is it possible Obama doesn’t really want to bail out the auto industry and he’s afraid of angering his union base? Who knows – all I know is that he is quitting early and leaving the decision on who will be the next US Senator from Illinois in the hands of a scandal-ridden Governor with a 13% approval rating.

Lest you argue that Governor Blagojevich would appoint the next Illinois Senator no matter what; wouldn’t it make more sense for Obama to wait until January 19, help the country through the current crisis, and hope the Governor resigns or is impeached between now and then? (I can dream.)

No matter how you slice it, quitting early does not sound like leadership to me. Let’s hope Obama has a really good reason for walking away in the middle of this crisis.

 

Leadership Development Blogwatch – Post Election Edition – November 5, 2008

 

Best of the Leadership Development Blogs

Partly due to the 2008 Presidential Race and partly due to the NFL season (now in week 10), we’ve had trouble finding too many great posts or articles on the Leadership Development blogs.

What we could find in the last few weeks was often too mediocre to recommend to our readers (we really do care about the tens of you who read this blog). However, given that we haven’t identified a best of the best in a month, we felt we should at least share with you the best of what we did find (it isn’t saying much). So here without further blather are the fattest guys in Ethiopia (also known as the Best of the Leadership Development Blogs):

(Editors’ Note: some of these are actually pretty good.)




Leadership Development – Good Board Governance
Leadership development is an often-overlooked issue of board management. Boards need leaders – experienced and well based in critical areas. It also needs professionally qualified members who both understand and are able to meet their

What Vision and Goals Mean
Mountain range photo. Conducted a workshop this weekend for a company around vision and goals. It was a great group to work with. I was truly honored to leave my imprint on their management team. I got to thinking this morning about why

New Managers – How Do You Keep From Getting Run Over?
New Managers – Avoiding the Inevitable Traps AC from Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (that’s in Canada for the geographically challenged leaders out there) wrote us in August for some advice on how to gain respect as a new manager.

Leadership Development: “This is Squishy Feely” Stuff
It’s not uncommon to run into resistance from the senior members of an organization that has just recognized that it might be good to professionalize and improve talent development and acquisition processes. I can even understand the …

Your Leadership Legacy
An exercise that visits the defining moments that have most influenced your leadership development can help you pass on to future generations how you learned to lead. Defining the important milestones you experienced to make you the …

Taking Responsibility – A Step Toward Progressive Leadership
Carole is President and Executive Coach of Progressive Leadership, offering executive coaching, organizational development consulting and leadership development training. Improve your business relationships, communication, …

Corporate Ethics and Good Governance Leadership
Smith specializes in turnaround management, strategic planning, leadership development and executive coaching. He also works as an executive and/or life coach in the areas of personal growth and spirituality. He is the author of Amazing …

Personality-focused coaching for leadership development.
Meanwhile, coaching has become a well-established method of one-on-one leadership development in many organizations. Given the research investigating the relationship between the FFM and work-related behavior and performance, …

Career Paths to Leadership & Leadership Development
Every one of those opportunities is a part of a lifelong curriculum of leadership development. Leadership is learned by doing, though others (positive and negative role model), sometimes hardships, and by more formal learning (books, …

Lessons of Leadership Development
Timeless advice on leadership from Nelson Mandela. Take a moment to think about how each of these 8 lessons will help you in developing into a strong leader, which is essential for small business success. …

What if Leaders Were Allowed to Design and Deliver Their Own …
So here’s my message to senior leaders: You don’t have to leave leadership development up to the training or HR departments. You can do it, with a lot of commitment and perhaps little bit of help. Instead of bemoaning the lack of …

Leaders at All Levels
We must abandon our traditional leadership development practices, they’re not working. The Apprenticeship Model is a rigorous system for providing experiences and feedback that are tailored to accelerate each leader’s development. …